My views have always been black and white. When you make a commitment to one person, whether it is in the eyes of the law, the church, family and friends, or privately to one another, you give up on any right to have sexual relations with another person. Infidelity did not come in shades in grey. To put it simply, if you have sex with someone other than your partner, you’re cheating on them and the relationship you’ve established together.

I have held on firmly to this belief most of my life, until a couple of confidences shook the foundations a little and left me pondering ‘how and why I reacted to their circumstances.

When Shane told me that he was contemplating ‘sex on the side’, something inside me shrivelled. I didn’t want to believe it. I have always had the utmost respect and affection for him. Shane has been married for a few years to the beautiful and capricious Natalie, yet their sex life is practically non-existent. He loves her deeply, but the only time she shows any interest in him physically, is when she is trying to have a child, and is known for using sex as a weapon. She has underlying problems but her refusal to acknowledge them or seek help leaves him no choice but to put up with it for the rest of his life. He has even contemplated the thought of getting Natalie’s consent, were to he to look elsewhere for sex but I know she would find it heartbreaking.

Megan’s story was different. Her long-time partner suffered an illness which due to the residual brain damage, left him with an altered personality. And while this has affected their relationship to the point where at times, he’s no longer the person he was, he has also lost interest in sex. Life has been difficult for both of them. She is unhappy with her life in general, and has confided in me that she is contemplating the thought of casual sex, again with no emotional attachment.

Both stories made me reconsider my black and white beliefs for a few confusing moments, yet I still hold onto them strongly. But more so, my reaction to each case has come as a surprise. I felt strongly against Shane straying from his marriage yet I was a little more open-minded in Megan’s case. Did I believe Shaun’s situation can be improved while Megan’s case held less hope? Maybe.

And it left me contemplating the serious and often controversial topic of infidelity.

What causes people to stray? If certain needs (not limited to sexual needs) are not met, does it lend itself to reason? Can infidelity ever be justified? Are there situations, such as the ones above, that make it more acceptable? Is it still considered to be cheating if it is done with the consent of the partner? Your opinion…

28 Comments to “Contemplating Infidelity”
  1. Cléa says:

    For the purpose of this discussion, can we please limit the comments to sexual infidelity, in other words, having sex in person (not cyber) with someone who is not your partner, and not the other grey areas such as emotional infidelity, open relationships, polyamory and so on.

  2. Mahd says:

    Sex is frivolous and silly and is also, simultaneously, the most important thing we have. To each of us it has a different ken. It’s how we create the generations that will follow us. It’s exciting and titillating and fun. It’s the ultimate expression of profound love for another person. In sex, we bare ourselves before another person; what other activity is so intimate and personal and so complex.

    There are no easy answers for complex situations like those of your friends. In all relationships, we have to hope that honesty and communication can adequately convey our needs and desires, and that efforts can be made to come together by both involved. Shane and Megan need to talk to their partners to find a solution, no matter what that may be. But stark views and beliefs about right and wrong should be examined in such situations; in them, the only true right way is the one that leads to happiness for both people involved.

  3. Zen Wizard says:

    What causes the DESIRE to stray in my opinion is the inevitable “power struggle” that evolves as the relationship progresses.

    In the first phase–which is romantic love–you can’t get enough sex, and what woman is going to refuse a man who is bringing home flowers every night?

    Then, she moves in.

    You have to throw your porn away and she replaces your beloved electrical spool with a real coffee table.

    Fido has to sleep outside. Your comic book collection is moved from its collectors’ case and into the attic–if not thrown away.

    You feel like an indentured servant who has no rights and is just a machine that brings the check home every two weeks.

    That is the antithesis of “sexy.”

    So Betty Lou in Accounting starts to look good, because she is not your, “Power Sapper”–even though if the relationship progresses, or would progress, it would be the same thing after a while in all likelihood.

  4. Casey says:

    I think the minute infidelity occurs, a large portio of the relationship is killed forever. That is the chance you’re taking when you let temptations get the better of you. I’ve known some “open” marriages, and they always seemed contrived and doomed to failure over time.

    For whatever reason, there are always strings of one sort or another. Those strings are pretty minor, I think, between friends who have find themselves crossing the line or with strangers you meet that night. those strings, I can live with, but when you mess around with someone’s wife, then you have strings attached to her, her husband, and her kids (assuming she has them).

    My answer is always to leave first. If you need strange that bad, then cut loose and go it alone like the rest of us seekers. If your partner doesn’t put out, let them no you consider it important enough to leave over (if you really do).

    Of course, I’m in a leaving place right now, and not one to stick things out. Under normal circumstances, I am loyal to a fault, and have stuck it out through some bullshit, but I don’t think I would anymore. I would leave, then get sad, sad, breakup ass.

  5. Essentially Me says:

    There should never be an exception. Sex is a huge part of being in a relationship. What happens when the casual sex turns into something more serious, meaning they develop feelings beyond just sex for the other person? Then what? No good could come of it. I know they are your friends and they must feel like they are at place where there is no other alternative, but I truly believe that things will get worse if they cross that path. I would hate to be in that situation, and hope that I never have to be. I’d like to say, “just get divorced” but I know that it’s not that simple. Anyways, I hope that your friends find what they are looking for and don’t hurt themselves or the people they care about in the process (if that’s even possible).

  6. Cléa says:

    Mahd: It’s too easy for us to say communication and honesty when there are factors that make it difficult to communicate or when individuals don’t want to be honest to themselves. I know Shane has tried over and over again, but still no progress.

    As to the beliefs you mention, that’s what surprised me, my reaction, not that it had anything to do with me.

    Zen: I can see the logic in what you’re saying, the circular argument that the Betty Lou’s become power sappers. And I’m not saying I disagree. But does it have to be viewed as such, when men willingly give up some of their habits?

    Casey: In Shane’s case, even if he sought and got agreement, it wouldn’t be considered an open marriage. And I totally agree when infidelity occurs, something dies for ever, something called trust.

    Threatening to leave doesn’t work if you know the person well, or if you’ve repeatedly threatened then gone back on your word. Megan’s case is tougher, as he’s changed a lot, and then there’s the ‘in sickness and in health’.

    EM: These are my thoughts too. Somebody is bound to get emotionally attached, or attached in some other way, and where does that leave the couple?

    Divorce is not really an option when nobody has cheated and they’re still in love, as in both cases. It’s tough. I wouldn’t want to be in the situation either.

  7. Kamigoroshi says:

    When a man strays, is it almost always unforgivable, but when a woman strays, does it always have to come with a good reason? I don’t know, for some reason, I always feel that is the situation in most cases. In a way, it’s entirely sexist.

    I’m going to be honest here because it’s pretty much an open book. The most eventful and happiest relationship I had was born out of infidelity. Give that I was very young and inexperienced, but straying is always the same and I make no excuses. I’ve made up for it as a closed chapter of my life.

    Because of that, I can understand how sex is a powerful drive but straying from a relationship always stem from one thing. To fulfill a desire that can’t be fulfilled in the current relationship. It doesn’t mean I condone it, but like all actions, it is the motives that gives rise to whether it is justified. Fulfilling a desire out of a bad relationship may be acceptable. Getting your rocks off for the fun of it is definitely a no no.

    However, if you do have consent from your partner, I think it’s still cheating. Just that now, whatever actions you pull off is entirely justified. On a smaller scale, Mel lets me date other women as long as I don’t sleep with them because she knows that’s the kind of person I am. Is this cheating? If you’re going to look at normal views, yes. But it works. As long as people know and people are hurt. Cheating may be cheating, but those grey lines are so blurred now.

  8. gboy says:

    Like you, I tend to have the same initial reaction - no excuses for playing away, none at all. But… like any moral dilemma, it seems simple on first inspection, but increasingly convoluted and complex with each subsequent analysis.

    I’ve known a few people who claim that there is an “understanding” ( I am talking married couples here ) that seeking action “on the side” is acceptable. Without exception this has been one sided. I think the same goes for “Open” relationships… I have not known many but the ones I have were never balanced. Typically, one was more jealous and insecure while the other was more dismissive and indifferent. A guy I used to work with and known since school was a serial cheater - even a week before his wedding I bumped into him out on the town, his lecherous tongue down the throat of some “pull”. It wasn’t the first time I’d seen it either. All he’d ever do was shrug his shoulders, like it was a stutter or some idiosynchrasy he was cursed with. I reckon his fiancee probably knew he was like that…. and I’m pretty sure she wasn’t.

    In cases like that it’s easy to take the moral high ground, but in the second instance you cited it’s not so easy. It then becomes a case of where each person draws the line, beyond which they might say “I no longer a life, as such, with this person”. Some people remain utterly faithful emotionally and sexually while their partners lie in comas for years and years. Others use obesity as justification for seeking the linear lambada outside of wedlock.

    I’ll be perfectly honest and say, that faced with one of those heartbreaking situations ( like the coma scenario ), after years and years, I could not say how or if I would cope. I don’t think anyone who hasn’t walked a mile in those shoes can.

    Good topic Cléa. :)

  9. Gorilla Bananas says:

    Sex means different things to different people. For some men, it can be nothing more than a physical release. I wouldn’t blame Shane for having casual sex elsewhere and don’t think Natalie has much cause for complaint. If she is using sex as a weapon, she is the cause of the problem.

  10. Cléa says:

    Kami: Of course, if you’ve known heartbroken men by their women’s infidelity, and the after effects, you’d know.

    I appreciate your honesty, after all this is a controversial topic.

    If you’re saying a bad relationship justifies it, why not break off the relationship first before straying? And does that mean you’re in a bad relationship if she lets you go out on dates but not sleep with anyone? Sounds a little confusing, or more like a semi-open relationship.

    Gboy: I can’t say I understand people in open relationships or know of any, so I’ll take your word for it. It seems logical that one person would be more open than the other, still difficult to grasp.

    What this has taught me is that it’s easy to judge in black and white in most cases (like the serial cheater you mention) but those situations like the ones I cited blur the lines.

    Those in long term comas and such are also a difficult category. But serial cheaters for the sake of sex make me wonder what lies beneath it all, and the kind of women who put up with it, when undeniably the trust has been broken. Again, is it something that one can’t understand unless they’ve walked in their shoes?

    Thanks Gboy. Difficult topic nonetheless.

    Gorilla B: I agree she is a major cause of the problem, and I know them both well. And her refusal to get help compounds the issue. I wouldn’t wish Shane a life of no sex, or little sex, believe me. Yet the thought of him with someone else, dunno… Maybe I’m too much of a romantic and believe in the vows they’ve made and hope for another solution.

  11. egan says:

    I’m not a fan of the cheating at all. I think Shane needs to grow some balls and have a very candid discussion with his wife about their relationship. It sounds like that’s happened in the past, but he needs to up the ante somehow. Sex is only one aspect of relationship.

    Your second story is a bit difficult. I still think the woman should break up with her partner before considering sex outside their relationship. Chances are she doesn’t want to have that discussion with him since it will not be fun or favorable.

    If it’s done with consent, I don’t believe it to be cheating. I’m just not sure how that sort of casual extramarital sex with a rubber stamp from the spouse could be healthy. All of this being said, I do believe there are times where a mistake can teach someone a valuable lesson in not taking their spouse/partner for granted ever again.

  12. egan says:

    Crikey, I’m not sure if my comment was lost or not. I came back here to basically say my previous comment was about as wishy washy as you can get. Maybe my comment will magically reappear.

  13. Cléa says:

    Egan: Upping the ante is something I’ve also told him. Great minds. And you’re right, he has tried it before, but she always seems to win.

    Megan’s story is awkward, and I’m not sure she wants to leave him. Or if she does, she hasn’t told me in so many words. But I agree, there are ‘cleaner’ ways of doing it.

    I’d be concerned that rubber stamp, if indeed it would work, would cause a rift between them which would lead to an inevitable separation.

    Egan: your comment made perfect sense. Just a little time delay in comment moderation.

  14. Kamigoroshi says:

    And you’re right Cléa that breaking up because you’re in a bad relationship is the right thing to do. In retrospect, it’s what I should have done despite my naivety.

    Yet I know some people that simply can’t because they simply cannot make or even see that choice. In part, out of fear for many things, but mostly because complacency, escapism and comfort being where they are leads to the belief that it’ll all be alright. It’s that fine line that they don’t want to end.

    In my case, no…it’s not a bad relationship, but somehow a healthy one. It’s hard to explain until you see it for yourself. She knows I’m a flirt. I know she’s a flirt. It’s that understanding between one another that allows us to know that while we may go out and have fun with others, we will always come home to bed together at the end of the day. That kind of security and trust is something you don’t find in every relationship.

  15. Justin says:

    As a disclaimer: My comment does not apply to “Open” relationships. I can’t pretend to know what two people are capable of working out/agreeing on, so I’ll keep this oriented towards relationships that are believed to be “closed” (at least by one of the parties involved).

    Cheating is born out of selfishness, and when the other partner decides to not confess after the act that selfishness is compounded with “arrogance.” I don’t buy the “It was only physical so why bother my partner with this information about my mistake” argument. When you don’t tell your partner you are deciding that the rest of your relationship with that person will be a lie, and any good times you have with your partner are based on a false premise. I believe people who choose this path are cowardly, and are either saying “My partner can’t do better than me so why trouble them with the thought of breaking up…” or “I won’t do it again, so I’m comfortable having my partner spend the rest of his/her life in a relationship that they may very well have left if I had been honest.”

    If a person really wants to be with someone other than their partner the only honourable ways to go about this are to a) break up with the person you are with or b) talk about your desires with your partner and see if there is a mutual agreement that you can make. In Shane’s case it would be wrong to selfishly cheat on Natalie because she is acting selfish with him. I think he needs to man up, talk to her, tell her where he is at, and if she doesn’t want to work on what is a real problem for him he should consider some type of separation (temporary or permanent).

  16. Jarod says:

    I agree with you - once you are in a committed relationship, infidelity is absolutely out of the question. SO, the solution to both Shane and Megan’s problem is simple: LEAVE. If someone doesn’t have the guts to get out of an unhappy situation, that is their shortcoming and frankly I do not feel sorry for them. The second (and I mean second) my significant other used sex as a weapon I would be out of there, I do not care how much I loved them. Similarly, if my significant other lost interest in me sexually - bye bye! It sounds cold, but I would rather have self-respect than love.

    But this is just me. I realize people have widely ranging views on these matters. I would rather be alone the rest of my life than be in a situation like you have described - however some people don’t have the ability to do this, the need someone else in their life no matter what. That is their choice, of course.

  17. Josh Williams says:

    I’ll get back with you on this one, it requires some genuine head thinkin’.

  18. Cléa says:

    Kami: Many people stay together for the reasons you mention, then one day out of the blue, something snaps or it doesn’t.

    What you describe in your relationship is a bit difficult to understand. I’m all for accepting and understanding being a big flirt while in a relationship that’s based on trust and lines aren’t crossed. But to go out with different people, to me that borders on an open relationship, and not something I’m into.

    Justin: I totally agree on breaking up first or a trial separation before doing the deed, yet so many stories tell otherwise. “It was only physical” doesn’t gel with me. The part about it won’t happen again evokes similar feelings. But let me throw this in, if it was a once only, and the couple had a strong and long-term relationship, a happy one at that, but one of them strayed once for whatever (unacceptable) reason, would you want to know? It’s not so black and white, is it?

    I see your point about Shane acting selfishly just because she does. It seems childish. I too believe he should be more forthcoming with what he wants instead of letting her get away with it. That I believe is his shortcoming, and have told him the same.

    Jarod: I don’t understand women who use sex as a weapon, and moreso men who let them. Leaving a bit difficult when there are young children in the equation but since this is not a recent problem, it makes me wonder what people put up with from the start, until they have enough.

    JW: No problem, I agree it needs a lot of thought.

  19. peefer says:

    Some thoughts … not my initial thoughts, of which there there are a zillion. But some from a different angle:

    We, the human animal, make up a lot of rules about how we should live. We cherish our rules so much that within our structure, we impose taxes on ourselves to support the makers and the enforcers of our precious rules. The benefit is that we thrive as a species. But take away some luxuries that we take for granted, electricity for example, or better yet the supply chain of food, and in a flash we start acting like beasts of the wild. What kind of beasts are we most like? Penguins? Bees? Bonobos?

    This idea of fidelity is a purely human construct. It may be rooted in the survival of our species insofar as stable families better propagate the gene pool forward. (Though it may be argued that the man-hunter and concubine is also a successful model for species survival and/or dominance.) It’s partly based on religion. It’s partly based on law. It’s partly based on health.

    I don’t have a black and white opinion about Shane & Co. because my opinion instantly changes depending on my viewpoint. Viewpoints include:

    Commitment is commitment.
    You only live once.
    What’s the hangup with sex, anyways?
    Infidelity = symptom of broader issue.
    Hollywood- and media-driven expectations of happiness and fulfillment.
    Society’s perceptions.
    We are just leathery bags of salt-water and protein.
    Egocentricity vs. selflessness.
    and on and on

    It is as if the answer depends on which game has been chosen … which rules we arbitrarily set for ourselves.

    Personally, I’m big on commitment, but like most humans, I have the luxury of electricity, food, and above all [knock wood], health in various forms. Take away some of these, and I have no idea how the animal in me may respond. No idea.

    Yes, I know. Strange comment.

  20. egan says:

    If she wants a dad for baby, things will have to change. That’s a bit of a stark reality for your friend, but it might work. If not, then she could be in the market for a new man. Maybe Shane can touch himself in a soothing way each morning? Just a thought.

  21. Cléa says:

    Peefer: Some responses… after some thought.

    Some very valid points you make about our animal roots, society, expectations and commitment. What struck me the most was Take away some of these, and I have no idea how the animal in me may respond. In other words, take something essential from us, like the basic need for sex with a partner, and how do we react?

    I guess that emphasises that we won’t know unless we’re in the situation, and maybe we shouldn’t be judgemental. But those of us who haven’t had those luxuries take away, probably hold onto our beliefs and view the situation in a more black and white light. Or we’re just romantics.

    Egan: Been there, done that. They have a little one and it changed nothing. As you’re your soothing suggestion, I’m sure he’s onto that without me telling him. But that’s never the same as the real thing, isn’t it…

  22. Sidney says:

    “Infidelity did not come in shades in grey.” I would not have expect such a quote from you.
    Well, life is NEVER black and white. Maybe it is not good… but it is a fact.

  23. Kamigoroshi says:

    Nothing happens out of the blue. People snap when there are underlying problems we can’t see have built up, even underlying problems that many couple deny can eventually cause people to stray. As long as whatever people desire aren’t fulfilled, it’s a ticking bomb between their willpower to stay and call of what they want.

    An open relationship to me is one where all your relationships are on the same level. You’re with everyone and no one at the same time. In my case, I am with someone. It is a serious relationship. At the same time, I can go out and have fun with other people. I think in a way, it is the way we define dating. It’s casual but it’s without expectations. It’s fun, but it’s sincere. Would it be fair for me to say you take it on a more serious level, one with expectations of something more?

    The only attachments I have is to the one person I devote my life to. I’m not saying that this works for everyone. Finding a woman secure enough to trust her man to go out with other women without doing anything stupid to jeopardize the relationship they already have is nigh improbable. But that’s how it’s worked out. Everything has a reason, even for the people I go out with.

  24. mez says:

    I don’t think there is really such a thing as sex without any kind of emotion attached. Even if you are that cold hearted there still might be other feelings associated like guilt, or worrying that someone will find out or something of THAT ilk. You can’t have something like sex happen without SOME kind of consequence in the emotion department. That’s how I see it anyway.

    I have no issue with open relationships. I wouldn’t stand to live in one however I think it’s cool if both parties truly consent to it. If it doesn’t hurt anyone else then fine. Infidelity has nothing to do with open relationships though. Infidelity is about going behind someone’s back. It’s about lying. It’s about completely disregarding the feelings of the person you are committed to by breaking the bond/trust you have with them. This is being a shitty partner end of story - no grey area there. Therefore no matter how you talk yourself around to the ‘but I had no choice but to stray’ way of thinking, it’s still wrong - not because of the sex so much but because it’s living a complete lie. It’s also putting your partner in danger of an STD, which is IMO a horrible thing to do to someone else. I don’t see any situation where the people involved can’t break up first if they don’t want to be in the relationship.

    Your first example - Shane needs to just have the conversation and be done with it. Seriously, I agree with Egan and the ’she always wins’ in the end thing …well I don’t buy it. Either he tells her this is what he’s feeling or he doesn’t. Is it hard? Bloody hell yes, but if worse comes to worse he could even write a note (if she seriously won’t let him get a word in). There’s no grey area there.

    The other example is different because the guy now has brain damage… She must be feeling the guilt of maybe wanting to leave him but feeling bad for bailing out. That’s horrible. I actually DO know someone in a similar circumstance and it’s actually a guy in the situation. His partner has sustained brain damage and they really don’t get along anymoe. While she was dying (though she survived) she made a request of him and he promised her that he would stay forever. The thing is, she didn’t die and now she’s a completely different person. He feels like he made her a promise to her that he can’t break now. Meanwhile, who comes back into his life? His first love (20 years later!) ..that tells him that she’s always loved him. I mean….THAT’S a grey area! I feel sympathy for all concerned in a situation like this but I do feel most sad for the woman who is cheated on. But yeah, a situation like that is probably the only grey area that makes sense - even though it’s still wrong..no matter how you look at it.

  25. Cléa says:

    Sidney: But that’s the truth. That’s why my own reaction to these situations made me question if there was a grey areas when it comes to infidelity. Life of course is never black and white, but commitment, be it in marriage or otherwise, trust and honesty are not values I take lightly.

    Kami: I have to be honest and say that it’s not for me. Dating others while in a committed relationship is not something I would agree to, on either side.

    Thanks for the clarification. I realise that I wanted to exclude such discussions then I asked the question. This topic obviously deserves a post of its own.

    Mez: Those emotions you describe are often left out of the equation but it’s true, they’re all part of it.

    The “I had no choice…” doesn’t gel with me. Even in Shane’s case, he has a choice, whichever way he decides. I’m with you and Egan, about being more forthright with Natalie, as I know it’s one of his weaknesses and I often tell him to be more assertive when it comes to her whims.

    The story of your friend saddens me and it sounds quite similar to Megan’s. When their personality changes, it’s out of anyone’s control. You often hear, “they’re not the same person I fell in love with” and usually it denotes a change here and there or falling out of love, but when it’s that severe, it makes for a miserable life. I see it in her.

  26. Justin says:

    “But let me throw this in, if it was a once only, and the couple had a strong and long-term relationship, a happy one at that, but one of them strayed once for whatever (unacceptable) reason, would you want to know? It’s not so black and white, is it?” - I’m afraid this is black and white for me.

    I have had a situation where this happened and it was kept from me. I found out about the instance from a source other than my (then) partner. I ended things immediately despite being the happiest I had been and I never once regretted it or thought “If only I had never found out.” If anything I was angry that I had spent a few months feeling happy when it was completely based on a false image of the other person.

    I think the decision not to tell always carries some element of the person who cheated feeling like, “Why bother my partner with this? They don’t deserve the unhappiness that the truth will bring.” In fact, the thing that was undeserved was the betrayal/breaking of trust.

  27. Kamigoroshi says:

    It certainly does, but at the same time, it does relate to the topic at hand and I think all of us answered the question in many ways. You can’t erase the fine line of cheating. Regardless of whether or not you have consent, you’re still going out with someone else regardless of your attachment.

    However, it is in its motives and consequences that determines how acceptable it is to society. To run to the arms of someone who cares to escape a bad relationship may sound justified, just as one given in purely to animal instinct be unacceptable.

    We all have a choice whether we can see it or admit it. It just depends on why you do it. Unfortunately, most people do it for the sex. It’s hard to believe that people can stray for a nobler reason. It’s an oxymoron, I know. Cheating. Noble. But like you said, we just might be romantics.

  28. Cléa says:

    Justin: First, I’m sorry you’ve been through this and I’m not saying this as platitude. An ex of mine (and two close friends) have been through the same and I know what it can do to a person.

    When I said long-term relationship I had this in mind. Recently, an older relative of mine found out after 30+ years of marriage, her husband had cheated on her in the past. They’d been happy otherwise and now she’s devastated. As wrong as it is, I’m not certain that she would have been better off not knowing. It’s not an excuse, personally I could never stand the husband, but I’m undecided as to whether the knowledge now is a good thing or not. That’s what I see as a grey area. But in your case, and that of my close friends, it was definitely black and white.

    Kami: “it is in its motives and consequences that determines how acceptable it is to society” – and that is why my reactions to both Shane and Megan’s situations affected me in different ways.

Powered by Martinis and one Margarita Special.
Copyright © 2007 2008 CBMused - All rights reserved. No content on this website including but not limited to text,images, banner and photography may be reproduced without prior explicit written consent of the blog author.